Tuesday, January 25, 2011
Infrastructure gets State of the Union nod
The good folks at The Infrastructurist have the scoop that Obama will push infrastructure spending in the State of the Union address (reframing the issue as infrastructure investment) and will link infrastructure upgrades and maintenance to economic competitiveness.
Monday, January 24, 2011
Commuter rail, right in my own backyard
Fellow traveller and blogger Barefoot and Progressive has the scoop on a possible commuter rail line between Lexington and Louisville in the bluegrass region of Kentucky.
I will discuss the pros and cons of such a project in the near future, and counter with a more viable proposal for commuter/inter-city rail in the Kentucky-Ohio-Indiana region.
I will discuss the pros and cons of such a project in the near future, and counter with a more viable proposal for commuter/inter-city rail in the Kentucky-Ohio-Indiana region.
Friday, January 14, 2011
New RNC chief, GOP to take aim at HSR, Amtrak spending
The budget hawks have prevailed in the latest congressional elections and the Republican National Committee just voted Reince Priebus their chairman. This is all bad news for both high-speed rail and passenger rail projects.
Priebus was formerly the chairman of the Wisconsin Republican Party, and successfully backed anti-rail candidate Scott Walker into the governor's mansion. In recent weeks Walker nixed Wisconsin's plans for an $810 million federally funded high-speed rail line between Chicago and Madison citing budget concerns. Priebus is likely to follow suit and make targeting transportation funding a party policy.
In Ohio and New Jersey Republican governers have also rejected important high speed rail projects that would have brought their states closer to a 21st century transportation system.
In the past, the Republican Party has been a staunch opponent of Amtrak, making repeated attempts to drown it like a 'baby in a bathtub'. Now GOPers, uninterested in long term budgetary fixes like raising the retirement age or making significant defense cuts, are targeting discretionary spending as a good place to save a few bucks - never mind that transportation and other discretionary spending make up an insignificant amount of the federal budget - less than 1% annually.
Priebus was formerly the chairman of the Wisconsin Republican Party, and successfully backed anti-rail candidate Scott Walker into the governor's mansion. In recent weeks Walker nixed Wisconsin's plans for an $810 million federally funded high-speed rail line between Chicago and Madison citing budget concerns. Priebus is likely to follow suit and make targeting transportation funding a party policy.
In Ohio and New Jersey Republican governers have also rejected important high speed rail projects that would have brought their states closer to a 21st century transportation system.
In the past, the Republican Party has been a staunch opponent of Amtrak, making repeated attempts to drown it like a 'baby in a bathtub'. Now GOPers, uninterested in long term budgetary fixes like raising the retirement age or making significant defense cuts, are targeting discretionary spending as a good place to save a few bucks - never mind that transportation and other discretionary spending make up an insignificant amount of the federal budget - less than 1% annually.
Thursday, January 13, 2011
Gas prices up.
Gas prices are at a national average of $3.08 and rising. This should underscore the need for HSR in the USA. Go get 'em, Secretary LaHood!
Ohio and Wisconsin Killed High-Speed Rail
So since I last posted, an election has taken place and new Republican administrations have been set up in the midwestern states of Ohio and Wisconsin. These administrations followed-through on campaign promises to stop high-speed rail corridor development in their respective states, seriously damaging the progress of building modern passenger rail infrastructure in the midwest.
The federal government diverted most of their money to ongoing projects in California, New York, Illinois and Florida, where faster and more beneficial projects are in progress. In the mean time, I'm sure the fiscally conservative governors in Wisconsin and Ohio have found responsible ways to budget.
Next up comes a serious challenge to the high-speed rail line in Florida that may see the $2.3 billion dedicated to building a Tampa-Orlando train diverted to other states. I am beginning to think that federal passenger rail funding should only go to the states that deserve it most: Illinois, California and New York. Why should our federal tax dollars go to developing states that don't want to be in the 21st century?
The federal government diverted most of their money to ongoing projects in California, New York, Illinois and Florida, where faster and more beneficial projects are in progress. In the mean time, I'm sure the fiscally conservative governors in Wisconsin and Ohio have found responsible ways to budget.
Next up comes a serious challenge to the high-speed rail line in Florida that may see the $2.3 billion dedicated to building a Tampa-Orlando train diverted to other states. I am beginning to think that federal passenger rail funding should only go to the states that deserve it most: Illinois, California and New York. Why should our federal tax dollars go to developing states that don't want to be in the 21st century?
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)